ClimateEdict #3: Coral Strain, Seaweed Surge, Carbon Storage Limits, and Arizona’s Extreme Heat
Opening Reflection
I realized early on that if you want something to change, you have to take the first step yourself. People cannot respond to problems they don’t know about, and the same holds true for the climate. Most people have a general sense that things are “bad,” but very few understand how specific processes are unfolding and what they mean for our future.
That is why I started this blog. I studied environmental management in school and have always cared deeply about ecosystems and the ocean. Diving has shown me both the beauty of marine life and its fragility. This blog is my way of raising awareness about what is happening right now and sharing the science in clear terms. Each week, I focus on stories where science, policy, and the environment meet, with an eye on the ocean that connects them all.
Even the Toughest Corals Are Shrinking

Corals in the northern Red Sea have been known for their ability to withstand higher temperatures, but new research shows that even these resilient species are beginning to shrink under long-term warming. Scientists studied Stylophora pistillata under six months of elevated temperatures and found that while they survived, their growth slowed dramatically. At 27.5°C, colonies were about 30% smaller than controls, and at 30°C they were 70% smaller.
This matters because corals form the foundation of reef ecosystems. If even the toughest corals lose growth, the outlook for less resilient species is worse. Smaller corals also mean weaker structures that support fewer fish and less protection for coastlines.
To me, this is more than a lab result. Some of the most vibrant reefs I have seen while diving are in the Atlantic, and they depend on the same processes of coral growth and oxygen balance. If resilient corals are now compromised, the question becomes: how long can the rest of the world’s reefs hold on?
Source: Science Daily — Red Sea corals, [BBC]
Monster Seaweed Bloom Taking Over the Atlantic

Sargassum, a floating brown seaweed, has always been part of the Atlantic ecosystem. But its growth has accelerated in recent years, creating what scientists now call the Great Atlantic Sargassum Belt. A review by Florida Atlantic University found that in May 2025, the biomass reached 37.5 million tons, the largest on record since monitoring began.
The expansion is fueled by nutrient runoff from agriculture, wastewater, and Amazon River outflows, combined with climate factors. Sargassum provides habitat for fish, turtles, and seabirds, but when it floods coastlines it blocks sunlight, smothers seagrass, and releases gases as it decays. For coastal economies, mass strandings mean costly cleanups and lost tourism.
Sargassum is a reminder that land-based choices ripple far offshore. I find this issue especially telling because it illustrates how ecosystems don’t operate in isolation. Fertilizers used thousands of kilometers inland can end up altering entire ocean basins.
Source: Science Daily — Sargassum, [World Economic Forum]
Carbon Storage Potential Far Lower Than Expected
For years, the assumption has been that underground reservoirs could safely hold vast amounts of carbon dioxide. Industry estimates suggested more than 14,000 gigatons of storage capacity. But new analysis suggests the usable space may be closer to 1,460 gigatons once realistic risk factors are included.
That is a tenfold reduction. If true, it means carbon capture and storage should be treated as a limited tool rather than a long-term safety net. The researchers argue it should be reserved for “negative emission” technologies such as direct air capture, rather than used to extend the life of fossil fuel power plants.
From my perspective, this makes sense. Carbon capture may help during the transition, but treating it as limitless risks delaying harder choices. It reinforces the point that prevention is better than cure: cutting emissions at the source remains the priority.
Source: Science Focus — Carbon storage, [Guardian], [Reuters]
Arizona’s Heat is Too Much Even for the Desert

Arizona has always been known for its extreme climate, but the recent heatwaves are testing even species adapted to survive in deserts. Reports show rattlesnakes dying in their burrows, saguaros struggling to photosynthesize at night, and animals like deer and pronghorn becoming dependent on artificial water stations.
When species built to endure heat are failing, it signals how fragile ecosystems have become under rising temperatures. To me, this connects directly to the larger climate story: if cacti and reptiles cannot cope, humans relying on the same landscapes for water and agriculture will also face growing risks. Arizona is often framed as an outlier, but it is a preview of stresses spreading elsewhere.
Source: Vice — Arizona heat, [New York Times]
Coming Up
Next week, the spotlight may fall on three fronts: whether Brazil’s Senate upholds or reverses President Lula’s vetoes on environmental licensing, the UN’s release of updated data on ocean acidification, and new signals from Asia-Pacific governments on coastal protection policies.
This blog exists to follow how decisions in science, policy, and business affect the oceans we all depend on. These stories are pieces of a larger picture, one that shows how choices made on land shape what happens at sea. As someone learning and writing about these topics each week, I see it as a way to keep track of changes while sharing them with others who care.
Sources
- Science Daily — Red Sea corals
- Science Daily — Sargassum
- Science Focus — Carbon storage
- Vice — Arizona heat
- [BBC]
- [Reuters]
- [The Guardian]
- [World Economic Forum]
- [New York Times]
Comments
Post a Comment